| 
 the medical evidence..... The Insurance Commission obtained a number 
			medical opinions from a variety of experts.  The Insurance 
			Commission Case Manager John Langton handling my claim 
			contacted his brother to write an expert medical report for ICWA. Although this doctor 
			never reviewed me in person, it was the only report that ICWA 
			presented at trial. Despite three other reports commissioned by 
			ICWA, Dr Paul Langton's report was the only report critical of my 
			claim that ICWA presented at trial.  ICWA likes to argue that I could have perused the 
			other experts' reports which ICWA's had obtained from independent 
			medical experts. At the time of the trial, ICWA claimed 
			privilege (meaning documents cannot be used under any circumstances) 
			on the most critical report from their psychiatrist, Dr. Peter 
			McCarthy. Additionally, ICWA insisted that if I wanted to submit any 
			of their (ICWA's) expert opinions as evidence, I would have to call 
			the expert to testify at the trial.    | 
  | 
         
          |   ICWA was insisting that any of my experts' 
		  opinions we wished to use at trial would have to be called 
		  individually to testify at trial. The need to call every single one of 
		  my experts caused a cost blowout of $30.000 
		  to $120.000 in witness costs alone.  ICWA's legal team initially 
		  agreed that many of our reports could be submitted without calling the 
		  expert witness to testify. This was meant to speed up the proceedings and 
		  not waste the court's time hearing multiple experts of the same field 
		  saying the same thing. Insisting that the plaintiff calls every expert 
		  on whose report he is relying simply serves the purpose to increase 
		  the plaintiff's financial damage which this is exactly what happened. In the end, I simply could not 
		  afford to pay for their experts to appear as well. It is 
		  important to note that an expert witness charges an average of $5.000 
		  to $10.000 per day for his time. There is also a peculiarity in Western Australian law where the party calling a witness can only question 
		  the expert on the contents of his report and what it says. The cross 
		  examining barrister, however, is free to tear into the witness and try 
		  and discredit the witness. Therefore, not only would have had the 
		  doubtful pleasure of paying for ICWA's experts to appear at trial, but I would 
		  also have 
		  given ICWA the chance to try and discredit the report and testimony of 
		  their own experts. In the end we were unable to call these experts, 
		  solely out of financial considerations. I If the same rules 
		  were applied as for claims settled out of court, ICWA would have had supply ALL the evidence they had obtained themselves to the judge, so that she/he at least has a chance 
		  to make an informed decision instead of an arbitrary one.
		  
		  The WA Attorney General, however, sees nothing wrong in how cases being 
		  heard before court and those settled out of court are treated 
		  fundamentally different.   ICWA and its legal team will not only 
		  obtain reports from medical experts, they will 
		  also engage the services of private 
		  investigators to track you and look into your past. In my case, I was 
		  investigated by two local PI firms. Nothing useful was found, but this 
		  did not stop ICWA again from claiming privilege over the reports, 
		  because they documented some illegal actions carried out by the PI's, 
		  on the instructions of ICWA.  Both parties are meant to exchange 
		  all documents in their possession. Claiming privilege over 
		  documents(not releasing/discovering a document) cannot be used to hide 
		  illegal actions, but that does not stop ICWA from doing just that.   However, in 2014 I made a Freedom of Information 
		  (FOI) 
		  application to ICWA and as a result a number of documents were released 
		  that had never previously been discovered, including the two reports from 
		  the detective agencies mentioned above. Because our home was obscured from view from the street, 
		   
		  
		  ICWA 
		  instructed the agency to trespass onto our property on several 
		  occasions. Although no incriminating evidence was found by the 
		  agencies, ICWA did not release the reports because of the criminal 
		  behavior of the agencies in trespassing onto our property to observe 
		  us in and around our home.   As a result of this new evidence and new 
		  additional evidence regarding ICWA's expert witness, Dr Paul Langton, 
		  being in great financial difficulty at the time he wrote his opinions 
		  and being paid the largest fee ever paid by ICWA to a doctor for 
		  medical opinions. Plus, Dr. Paul Langton, later being struck off as a doctor by the Australian Health Practioner Regulation 
		  Agency (AHPRA), amongst other things for supplying his drug addicted 
		  teenage girl friend with morphine and administering morphine and other 
		  drugs to himself; 
		  
		  I made a second attempt to have ICWA investigated by 
		  the CCC for instructing a private detective agency to trespass onto 
		  our Kalamunda home, to observe us in and around our home and ICWA 
		  using an expert who was not only the brother of the ICWA case manager 
		  responsible for my case, but a doctor with such a questionable 
		  reputation! 
		   
		  
		  Once again the CCC refused to investigate the matter! 
		  A Mr. M. K., a former ICWA employee who was initially 
		  involved in my claim and now a whistleblower about ICWA's tactics,
		  
		  
		  also made a complaint to the CCC regarding ICWA's Senior Case Manager 
		  John Langton and ICWA's serious Conflict of Interest in how ICWA 
		  handles claims. Mr. M. K. was actually the ICWA employee
		  
		  
		  who instructed the ICWA's private investigators to 
		  trespass onto our 
		  Kalamunda property. In his defence 
		  however, he only did so because 
		  he was instructed by his superiors to do so! The CCC forwarded Mr. 
		  M. K. complaints about ICWA to the CCC for investigation and response.
		  
		  
		  The CCC then proceeded to close Mr. M. K.'s file 
		  immediately. ICWA 
		  off course has never responded to Mr. M. K.'s complaints.   I am supplying mainly ICWA's reports for 
		  viewing, not because I have something to hide, but because a supportive 
		  report from the other side (ICWA), is more valuable at trial than a 
		  report from your own experts. I have however included a copy of the book of 
		  expert medical reports, that were used at trial and made available to 
		  the judge. Again, I must emphasize, that ICWA withheld every report, 
		  except the ones it obtained from ICWA's Case Manager's brother, Dr. Paul 
		  Langton.   ICWA's Expert Medical reports: 
			  
				  | 
				  Dr.’s Name | 
				  
				  Specialty | 
				  First seen | 
				  No. of 
				  reports |  
				  | Dr. Andrew Marsden | Occupational Health 
				  Specialist & Approved CASA (Civil Aviation and Safety 
				  Authority of Australia) Medical Examiner | 
				  
				  30/10/06 | 
				  
				  report 1 
				  
				  
				  
				  report 2 |  
				  | Dr. David Wright 
				   | Orthopedic Surgeon | 
				  
				  12/11/07 | 
				  
				  report 1 
				  
				  report 2 |  
				  | Dr. Oswald Tofler | Cardiologist | 
				  
				  11/12/07 | 
				  
				  report 1 
				  
				  report 2 |  
				  | Dr. Paul Langton | Cardiologist(Brother of John Langton/ICWA 
				  Senior Case 
				  Manager responsible for my claim) | 
				  Not 
				  seen in person | 
				  
				  report 1 
				  
				  report 2
				  
				  
				  
				    
				    |  
				  | Dr. Peter McCarthy | Psychiatrist | 
				  
				  13/10/08 | 
				  
				  report 1 |                        
		  Updated 16 May 2020 JPS 
 |