| Lawyers in Western Australia are extremely 
		  expensive and the dysfunctional legal system makes it even more so. I 
		  met one who 
		  does not charge by the hour. His flat rate is $10.000 plus expenses, 
		  irrespective of whether the job takes 30 minutes or 
		  an entire day. As you will see from the two Cost Disclosure Agreements below you 
		  will pay for every phone call, letter, reading of an email and photocopy. 
		  My favorite, is the cost of a photocopy at $1 plus GST per page. If 
		  the person operating the photocopier could pocket the money he/she could make tens of thousands of dollars 
		  per 
		  month.  I had to pay $400/hour plus GST for my solicitors and 
		  a lot more for 
		  a barrister. At the time, $400 was the maximum a solicitor could 
		  charge for taking on a personal injury case. However, it did not  
		  stop one firm from trying to charge me an "uplift fee" of 10% on top 
		  of the $400. I refused to pay it. I don't deny that I went to a lawyer of my own 
		  free will, but nothing could quite prepare me for the experience that 
		  followed. Initially I approached my first solicitor from Mossensons in 
		  Perth due to ICWA not reimbursing me for any of my treatment 
		  costs. I just had arrived from Europe after an absence of twenty years 
		  from, Australia and I 
		  had no idea what our rights were or how the third party insurance 
		  system worked. When our accident became a personal injury case it 
		  turned out that Mossensons had little to no experience in this area. 
		  My solicitor Anthony Prentice was unable to advise 
		  me where I could obtain independent expert medical opinions. After 
		  three years of exorbitant legal fees and little to no progress  I was 
		  forced to look for alternative legal representation. One of my 
		  daughter's went to school with the daughter of Mr. John D'Angelo and 
		  that is how I ended up with Friedman, Lurie, Singh and D'Angelo 
		  (FLSD). I will let the reader be the judge when 
		  comparing the Cost Disclosure Statements below and the actual 
		  costs that were billed by Mossensons. From the time of the MVA in 2003 to trial 
		  begin in 2009 I paid for all my 
		  legal fees and expert reports. In addition, during the trial I paid 
		  for all subsequent reports 
		  and expert witness costs (approximately $250.000). All up I paid 
		  around $500.000 over seven years. Today I am left with 
		  additional legal fees for the trial parts which amount to roughly $300.000 
		  to $400.000. Beware of the No Success No Fee model offered 
		  by some legal firms:  
			  
			  1) You loose all control over your claim 
			  
			  2) If you receive only a single dollar in 
			  compensation, you will be up for all your legal costs
			  3) If you receive no compensation whatsoever, you become liable for 
		  the other side's (defendant) legal costs and in most cases the cost of 
		  your own disbursements (as mentioned above in my case were 
		  $250.000 during the trial period in 2009 alone).
			  The law firm will not hesitate 
			  to put a caveat on any property you might own. It is very important tot understand that any person seriously injured in a motor 
		  vehicle accident with a claim to be expected to be above above 
		  $250.000 realises that he/she has a 90% chance of the claim going before a 
		  court for settlement. It is when the courts become involved that the 
		  costs really skyrocket requiring: 
			  settlement conferencespre trial conferenceswitness costsexpert reportstrial costsvideo conference coststranslation costsand in most cases a barrister's services   During this time you will most probably: 
			  not receive any salary continuance from ICWA ICWA will probably not pay for all or any of your treatment and 
			  medication costs  Note: If ICWA settles a 
			claim out of court, ICWA is required to consider ALL available 
			evidence when calculating an offer. However, if a claim goes to court 
			for settlement ICWA is not required to consider ALL available 
			evidence and more unfortunately ICWA is permitted to withhold 
			evidence from court (this is called 'claiming privilege over 
			documents') which might support a 
			plaintiff's claim. 
			According to the WA Attorney General this 
			is a legitimate tactic!  I don't believe that being able to withhold 
		  evidence was the intent of the original legislation.  
			  
			  The option of 
		  going to court is being used by ICWA to circumvent the requirement 
		  that ALL evidence must be considered when settling out of court.
		  	
			  Without having access to ALL the evidence available, a court decision 
		  is always going to be arbitrary and will result in too many unsatisfactory/unfair 
		  outcomes! 
 
		  
		  Cost Disclosure Statement - Mossensons 
		  
		  Cost Disclosure Statement - Friedman Lurie Singh & D'Angelo 
		  
		  Actual invoiced costs - Mossensons 2003-2007  
		  
		  Caveat placed by Friedman Lurie Singh & D'Angelo on our home 
		    
		    
 |